Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49746 (PNJ)

SURESH ALIAS SURESH CHANDER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/22545/2025 · 2025-05-06

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

306 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22545-2025 DECIDED ON: 06.05.2025 SURESH ALIAS SURESH CHANDER .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Parveen, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Wasu, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG, Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. for Grant of Interim Bail for 6 to 8 weeks on medical grounds (earlier two petitions for regular bail stand dismissed as withdrawn) to the petitioner in case FIR No.697 dated 22.10.2020 under section 302, 328 and 404 of IPC, 1860 (Section 34 Deleted and Section 404 of IPC added by Police Later on) registered at Police Station Shivaji Colony, District Rohtak. Today status report by way of affidavit of Ravi Khundia, HPS Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rohtak has been filed by learned State Anuradha 2025.05.08 05:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-22545-2025 2 Counsel, the same is taken on record. Copy of the same has been furnished to the counsel opposite. In view of the reply filed by learned State Counsel, counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 06.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.08 05:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document