Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49743 (BOM)

MUNNA SHAH MUBARAK SHAH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, HTR. PSO, CHIKHALI, TQ. CHIKHALI, DIST. BULDHANA AND ANR

BA/518/2025 · 2025-09-20

Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 12.ba.518.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 518/2025 Munna Shah Mubarak Shah Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. M. Awachar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ujjwal Phasate, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. Mr. V. V. Sharma, Advocate (Appointed) for Non-applicant No.2. CORAM : MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J. DATED : 20/09/2025. . On instructions, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file before the Trial Court if the trial is not initiated within a period of one year. 2. The application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. The fees of the appointed Counsel be quantified as per Rules. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:9442