Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49730 (AP)

Smt. B.Susheela Devi v. The Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager,

WP/13969/2014 · 2025-09-15

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010268582014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13969/2014 Between: 1. SMT. B.SUSHEELA DEVI, W/O KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF RAJAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, VISAKHA DIVISIONAL OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, SECUNDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased toto issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings Ref.VR/KSK, dated 21-5-2012 of the 1st respondent cancelling selection of Dealership of Kishan Seva Kendra Retail Outlet at Rajam - Penubaka road, Srikakulam District without notice and opportunity is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unsustainable, contrary to law and violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as dealer of KSR Retail Outlet at Rajam - Penubaka road, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 17432 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as dealer of Kishan Seva Kendra Retail Outlet at Rajam - Penubaka road, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District by suspending the proceedings Ref.No.VR/KSK dated 21-5-2012 of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA 2. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 21.05.2012 issued by the 1st respondent, whereby the selection of the Dealership of Kishan Seva Kendra Retail Outlet at Rajam, Penubaka Road, Srikakulam District, was cancelled without notice or opportunity to be heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not received any instructions from his client. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner did not possess the requisite working experience, and therefore, her selection was cancelled vide letter Ref. VR/KSK dated 21.05.2012. 4. It appears that no interim order has been granted in the matter till date. 5. In view of the above submissions, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 16th September, 2025 cbn 5 230 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.13969 of 2014 16th September, 2025 cbn