Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49725 (KAR)

THE BRANCH MANAGER NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., v. BALAPPA @ BALAPPAGOUDA AND ORS

MFA.CROB/200075/2023 · 2025-02-10

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 200075 OF 2023 (ECA) BETWEEN: THE BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., HANUMSHETTY BUILDING, S.S. FRONT ROAD, VIJAYAPUR - 586101. PRESENTLY REPRESENTED BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 10-2-7, P.B. NO.12, IIND FLOOR, S.B. TEMPLE ROAD, SANGAMESHWAR NAGAR, KALABURAGI - 585102. ...CROSS OBJECTOR (BY SRI. UDAY P HUNGUNTIKAR AND AMRUTA V. DESHMANYA ADVOCATES) AND: 1. BALAPPA @ BALAPPAGOUDA S/O BASANGOUDA CHILARADINNI @ BIRADAR AGE:55 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O BALVANT, TQ: MUDDEBIHAL, 2 MFA CROB 200075/2023 DIST: VIJAYAPUR - 586212. 2. IRAMMA W/O BALAPPA @ BALAPPAGOUDA CHILARDINNI @ BIRADAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O BALVANT, TQ: MUDDEBIHAL, DIST: VIJAYAPUR - 586212. 3. MOHD. HANIF S/O HABEB SARVAR, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS R/O HOKKUNDI, TQ & DIST: VIJAYAPUR - 586101. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL CROSS OBJECTION IS FILED U/O 41 RULE 22. BY THE ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT HEREBY PRAYED THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY KINDLY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND AWARD COMPENSATION OF Rs.10,97,350/- ALONG WITH INTEREST @12% P.A BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND COMMISSIONER FOR EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION, VIJAYAPUR IN ECA NO.64 OF 2019 DATED 28.01.2022, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 3 MFA CROB 200075/2023 ORDER None appears. One week time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which the Cross Objection stands dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide order dated 10.02.2025 the advocate for the appellant has not complied the office objections, Hence, the appeal stands dismissed without further reference to the Bench. SSdd//-- A ASSSSIISSTTA AN NTT R REEG GIISSTTR RA AR R T By : SB R By : VK C By : NHD