Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4972 (GAU)

M/s Sports India Construction Company v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

WP(C)/432/2025 · 2025-10-21

Marli Vankung

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040015522025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/432/2025 M/s Sports India Construction Company having its registered office at Gohpur Tinali, Itanagar, PO RK Mission, PS Chimpu, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh represented by its proprietor Shri Sama Dodum, Son of Late Taje Dodum, a permanent resident of Village Laching Bagang, PO and PS Chayang Tajo, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Principal Secretary/ Commissioner (PWD), Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Western Zone PWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Sagalee Circle PWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Sagalee. 4:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Seppa Division PWD Page No.# 2/3 Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Seppa. 5:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Technical and Financial Board for the construction of Road from Sebibo to Nerea via Laimoya and Sarewa village in East Kameng District (Ph-I) 6:M/s Hill Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Smti Manaki Natung Wife of Shri Mama Natung Lamdung Village PO and PS Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh 790102 7:M/s Loffa Construction Agency Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Takar Yangda Son of Late K Yangda Village Loffa PO and PS Seppa East Kameng District Arunachal Pradesh. 79010 Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara, Pondit Ronya,Kirmani Lollen,Y Mugli,Terji Kamchi,Taba Tokur,Khoda Apa,Gamken Bam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER Date : 22-10-2025 Mr. G. Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the instant writ petitioner since the petitioner are no longer interested in pursuing the matter. Mr. Y. Riram, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents is present. In view of the above, WP(C)432(AP)/2025 stands disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant