Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49717 (RAJ)

STAYTING STAYTS (OPC) PRIVATE LIMITED v. SMT. PREM AGRAWAL WIFE OF SHRI PRAKASH AGRAWAL

CW/9433/2025 · 2025-11-03

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44011] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9433/2025 1. Stayting Stayts (Opc) Private Limited, Through Director Shri Shashi Sharma Son Of Shri Shanti Prakash Sharma, Resident Of (A) House No. D 174, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur And (B) Resident Of Jalebi Chowk Village Bhumavada, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 2. Shri Shashi Sharma Son Of Shri Shanti Prakash Sharma, Resident Of (A) House No. D 174, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur And (B) Resident Of Jalebi Chowk Village Bhumavada, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus Smt. Prem Agrawal Wife Of Shri Prakash Agrawal, Through Power Of Attorney Sonu Agarwal Resident Of Near Jama Maszid, Gangapur City Presently Residing At Flat No. 301, Jkd Pearl, Stylom Apartment, Mahaveer Nagar, Near Ram Mandir, Jaipur Pin Code 302018 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.K.Daga Mr.Amit Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr.Shiv Charan Gupta Mr.Harsh Saraswat Ms.Ishani Agrawal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 03/11/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 06.02.2025 passed by the learned Rent Tribunal No.1, Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the applicant-respondent under Section 19-A of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 has been partly allowed, thereby directing the [2025:RJ-JP:44011] (2 of 2) [CW-9433/2025] petitioners to pay Rs.2,80,000/- per month on or before 10th of every month till the final disposal of the eviction petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions of the client, who is present in the Court, submits that the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition while granting liberty that the question with regard to the alleged rent notes may be kept open, as he is willing to raise such plea before the learned Rent Tribunal. 3. Permission sought for is granted. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Monika/7