NEELAM KUMARI KATEWA D/O BHAGIRATH SINGH KATEWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17925/2025 · 2025-11-21
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49705 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49705 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47319] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17925/2025 Neelam Kumari Katewa D/o Bhagirath Singh Katewa, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gram And Post Bibasar, Ward No.-1, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Mission Director, Nhm (National Health Mission) And Joint Secretary To Government, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
4. M/s Bachan Kumar Mangtu Ram Company/proprietor, Bapu Basti, Ward No.-20, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan- 333001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhirendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025
1. Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent Nos.1 to 3, who shall consider the representation of the petitioner in light of grievance made by the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:47319] (2 of 2) [CW-17925/2025]
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner(s) is still aggrieved, she has a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with pending application, if any.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/111