1 2025:CGHC:47260 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10076 of 2025 Radhika D/o Shri Govind Ram, Aged About 20 Years R/o H. No. - 27, Ward No.- 11, Village - Mouhadih, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - The District Women And Child Development Officer, O/ O The Women And Child Development, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - The Project Officer, Unfied Child Development Project, Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Kamleshwari, D/o Shri Umend Ram, Aged About 20 Years R/o H. No. - 27, Ward No. - 11, Village - Mouhadih, Janpad Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. K.N. Nande, Advocate For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.18 10:50:31 +0530 2 15.09.2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 15.07.2025 issued by respondent No. 5 by which respondent No. 6 has been appointed as Aanganbadi Sahayika at Viilage Mouhadih at Aanganbadi Center Mouhadih, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.). 2. Learned counsel for the State would submit that as per Clause 11 of the circular dated 02.04.2008 issued by the State of Chhattisgarh, the petitioner has alternate remedy of filing an appeal. 3. Since the petitioner has alternate remedy of filing appeal and other remedies which have been provided in the circular dated 02.04.2008, the instant writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take recourse available to her by filing the appeal. 4. With this observation the instant writ petition is disposed of. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioner prefers an appeal before the concerned appellate authority within one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the appellate authority is directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously on its own merit without considering any delay in preferring the appeal. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika