Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49696 (RAJ)

NIKHIL VARDHAN S/O NIPENDRAVARDHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/196/2025 · 2025-11-04

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44380] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 196/2025 Nikhil Vardhan S/o Nipendravardhan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Keshavpura Sector-4, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota (Raj). ----Petitioner/Victim Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Station House Officer Of Ps Jawahnagar, Kota. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Kumar Gupta, PP with Mr.Shubham Sain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/11/2025 1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.274/2024 registered with Police Station Jawaharnagar (Kota City), District Kota City. 2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 19.10.2024, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, therefore, appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, therefore, directions sought for should not be granted. [2025:RJ-JP:44380] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-196/2025] 4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of October, 2024, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation. 5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /83