Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4969 (AP)

LINGAMALLU DILEEP KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2062/2025 · 2025-01-29

V Sujatha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) :: AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2062 OF Between: Colony, Hyderabad, Tdanga^na Stltf"'®" Township, Kukatpally, KPHB ...Petitioner AND e ariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District ’ Co'‘PO''ation, Represented by Guntur Municipal Corporation Office, Guntur ^ its Commissioner, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the herein particularly Respondent No.2 i building situated at Old D.No.6-19-22 may more particularly one in the action of the Respondents in touching upon the Petitioner^ and New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet Guntur City, Guntur District (Shop. No 12 given Municipality) and giving markings without having any right or authority highhandedly and subjecting the Petitioner to distress as nothing but illegal, erroneous, highhanded and violative of Article 14, 19(i)(g), 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents much less the Respondent No.2 not to meddle with the Petitioner^ building situated at Old D.No.6-19-22 and New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet, Guntur City, Guntur District (Shop. No. 12 given Municipality) without following the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 LA NO: 1 OF procedure contemplated under Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed in pleased to direct the Respondent praying that in the circumstances support of the petition, the High Court may be no.2 not to meddle with the Petitioner’s peacefui possession and enjoyment of the buiiding situated at Old D.No.6- 19-22 & New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet, Guntur No. 12 given Municipality) without following under The Right to Fair Compensation Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement the above writ petition. City, Guntur District (Shop, the procedure contemplated and Transparency in Land Act, 2013, pending disposal of Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SRI A.S.C. BOSE, SC for MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for the Respondent No.2: The Court made the following order: 11 APHC010040112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2062/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Lingamallu Dileep Kumar AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.AKKISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent No.2 in touching upon the Petitioner’s building situated at Old D.No.6-19-22 & New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet, Guntur City, Guntur District (Shop No.12 given by Municipality) and giving markings without having any right or authority highhandedly and subjecting the Petitioner to distress as nothing but illegal, erroneous, highhanded and violative of Articles 14, 19(i)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents much less the Respondent No. 2 not to meddle with the Petitioner’s building situated at Old D.No.6-19-22 & New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet, Guntur City, Guntur District (Shop No. 12 given by Municipality) without following the procedure contemplated under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and pass ....” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. The petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the house 3. bearing Old D.No.6-19-22 & New D.No.31-44/1, Arundalpet, Guntur City Guntur District (Shop No.12 given by Municipality), where the petitioner is residing and carrying on his own business. While the matter being so, the respondents are intending to give markings to their shop for road widening purpose without following due process of law and without paying fair compensation to him. However, the case of the petitioner is also that the respondents have orally informed that they will give TDR certificate instead of fair compensation. 3 Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions, informed this Court that they are intending to issue a notice under Section 146 of APMC Act, 1955, to the petitioner and follow the procedure as contemplated under Sections 146 and 147 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 as well as the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. In view of the same, instead of keeping the writ petition pending, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2^^ respondent not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner without following the procedure as contemplated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANl^EGISTRAR OFFICER 4. 5. 6. closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2 The Commissioner, Guntur Municipal Corporation, Guntur Municipal Corporation Office. Guntur, Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri A K Kishore Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri A.S.C. Bose, SC for Municipalities [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development^ High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies RAM HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.2062 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS