Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49688 (CHH)

NAKUL NAYAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2873/2025 · 2025-09-14

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:47329 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2873 of 2025 1. Nakul Nayak S/o Balbhadra Nayak Aged About 25 Years R/o Pupu Gaon Post Bobiya, Police Station Kotpad, District- Koraput, Orissa. 2. Harkesh S/o Budha Mali Aged About 30 Years R/o Gangapur City, Mirjapur Ward No. 8 Panch Mukhi Hanuman Mandir Ke Pass, Police Station Kotwali Tahsil and District- Gangapur City, Rajasthan. ... Petitioners versus State of Chhattisgarh Through- P.S. Nagarnar, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioners : None. For Respondent : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 15.09.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 14.06.2024, passed in MCRC No. 2885 of 2024, while rejecting the bail to the applicants, namely, Nakul Nayak and Harkesh, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.09.16 17:43:31 +0530 2 3. Earlier on occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for conclusion of the trial vide order dated 04.04.2025 in CRMP No.1210/2025. 4. Learned Special Judge (NDPS Act) Jagdalpur, District - Bastar (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 01.09.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that, in the present case, statement of 07 witnesses have already been recorded, and the statement of 03 witnesses are yet to be recorded. Hence, the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, he prays for grant of further more time for concluding the same. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti