Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49686 (ORI)

ANITA ANSUMALI SAHOO v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/21562/2025 · 2025-08-14

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.21562 of 2025 Anita Ansumali Sahoo ..... Petitioner Mr. S.D. Routray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A.Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 14.08.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner files the order of engagement issued in favour of the Petitioner by way of memo in Court today. The same be kept in record. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to: i) Admit the writ application. ii) Call for the record. iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions by directing the opposite parties more particularly opposite party no. 1 & 2 to regularize the service of the petitioner against the vacant sanctioned post of Community Organizer which has been created vide order did. 30.07.2018 under Page 2 of 2. Annexure-5 within a reasonable time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. iv) And further direction be issued to the opp. parties to grant all service and financial benefits to the petitioner from the date of initial appointment. v) And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for the said act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.1 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti