222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SURENDER PAL STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Rahul, HARKESH MANUJA 1. Prayer in the pr direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing EXE/ Haryana and Others 2. Admittedly, Rect. No.50, Killa No.10/1/13 (measuring 0K the revenue estate acquired for the public purpose namely, periphery road from Kherki Daula to Dwarka, New Delhi award dated 23.12.2009. 3. Feeling dissatisfied, the Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1 Court and vide judgment dated 01.10.2019, Judge, Gurugram acre. Dissatisfied with the aforesaid U/s 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which came to be allowed vide order dated 14.11. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SURENDER PAL Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Rahul, Advocate for the petitioner. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing EXE/673/2024 titled as “ Haryana and Others” within a time bound manner period. Admittedly, land measuring 160 square yards comprised in Rect. No.50, Killa No.10/1/13 (measuring 0K the revenue estate of Village Choma, Tehsil and District Gurugram acquired for the public purpose namely, development of 150 meter y road from Kherki Daula to Dwarka, New Delhi 23.12.2009. Feeling dissatisfied, the landowners Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 before the Reference Court and vide judgment dated 01.10.2019, Judge, Gurugram enhanced the compensation @ Rs.4,06,34,750/ Dissatisfied with the aforesaid award, U/s 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which came to be allowed order dated 14.11.2024 whereby, learned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2529-2025 Date of Decision: April 28, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate with petitioner. esent civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution “Surender Pal vs. State of within a time bound manner period. 160 square yards comprised in Rect. No.50, Killa No.10/1/13 (measuring 0K-5M-2Sarsai) situated in Village Choma, Tehsil and District Gurugram was development of 150 meter y road from Kherki Daula to Dwarka, New Delhi followed by an landowners filed petitions under 894 before the Reference Court and vide judgment dated 01.10.2019, learned Addl. District enhanced the compensation @ Rs.4,06,34,750/- per the petitioner filed petition U/s 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which came to be allowed learned Addl. District Judge, TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.30 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2529-2025 -2- Gurugram held the petitioner entitled to received award amount deposited in Court amounting to Rs.2,99,394/- with interest up to date. Having failed to received the amount of compensation, the petitioner filed execution application i.e. EXE/673/2024 which is pending for 14.08.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being aggrieved of the delay has filed the present revision petition for issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the execution petition expeditiously, in a time bound manner. 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. A perusal of record shows that execution petition (Annexure P-3) filed by the petitioner, is still pending and the petitioner is waiting to get his full amount of compensation on the basis of decision dated 14.11.2024 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Gurugram. 7. In Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and others (2021) 6 SCC 418, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as follow:- “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceeding within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay.” 8. In view of the aforementioned legal position, the Executing Court is requested to dispose of the execution No.EXE/673/2024 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of next 06 months from today, as any further delay may cause serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioner-land owner. TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.30 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-2529-2025 -3- 9. It is made clear that nothing stated herein-above shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution proceedings. 10. The present petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms without issuance of any notice to the respondents as it may cause further delay in the proceedings. 11. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 28.04.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.30 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document