Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 49671 (BOM)
TEJRAO S/O PIRAJI DIWTHANE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, REPRESENTED BY COLLECTOR, BULDHANA AND OTHERS
FA/39/2018 · 2025-09-22
Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49671 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49671 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 58.fa.39.2018 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO. 39 OF 2018 Tejrao s/o Piraji Diwthane ..vs.. State of Maharashtra and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 22/09/2025. Today the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 12.09.2025 there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant and therefore to grant one more opportunity, this matter again listed today. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant in the morning sessions as well as in the afternoon session.
2. Hence it is clear that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the present appeal.
3. As such, the appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J. )
Trupti