APHC010039762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: K Ramesh The Central Govt Industrial Tribunal And 2 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SC FORCENTRL GOVT) 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3. BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus of LCID No.141 of 2014 on the file of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1850 OF 2019 AND The Central Govt Industrial Tribunal And 2 Others and ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO(SC FORCENTRL GOVT) DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) The Court made the following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the 1st respondent to dispose of LCID No.141 of 2014 on the file of 1st respondent expeditiously by fixing IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of respondent to dispose respondent expeditiously by fixing time limit to mitigate the hardship to the petitioner and pass such other orders”. 2. Heard Dr.P.B.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Josyula Bhaskara Rao, learned Senior Counsel for Central Government/ respondent No.1 and Sri Bathula Raj Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was removed from service without any notice, which is quite contra to the principles of natural justice. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner has filed a petition before the respondent No.1 i.e LCID No.141 of 2014 and it is still pending. Learned counsel would further submit that the Writ Petition may be disposed of, issue a direction to the respondent No.1 for disposal of LCID No.141 of 2014 within time bound. 4. Learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of LCID No.141 of 2014 as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2025 KK