APHC010445302016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40016/2016 Between: 1. B. RAJESWARI, W/O. HAZARATHIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/ O. RALLACHALIKA, SANGAM VILLAGE 85 MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECRETARY REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( REVENUE ), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR. DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ATMAKUR, DIVISION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDHAR, ANANTHASAGARAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, UN-EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANISATION, DANDUVARI STREET, OPP. TOWN HALL, NEAR VRC CENTER, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th respondent by issuing impugned proceedings dated 05.08.2016 vide Proc. No. 24/C/2016, by terminating the petitioner from service with immediate effect ba'sing on the reference of the 2nd respondent vide proceedings COLNLR-BSE/28/2016-SA(B7)- REV-NLR, Dt.01.08.2016, is illegal, arbitrary,' opposed to the established principles of law and are in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently setaside the same by direct the respondent authorities to .continue the petitioner into service in the 2 respective post by duly paying the pay and pass such other or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 49296 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to continue the petitioner into service in the respective post, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S VENKATA SUBBA RAO 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is called, Sri T. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events occurred in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, he submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 26.09.2025 GVK 3 279 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.40016 of 2016 Date: 26.09.2025 GVK