Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49666 (ORI)

SUNITA SHAW v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/21159/2025 · 2025-08-06

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21159 of 2025 Sunita Shaw & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. L. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Jee, AGA COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 06.08.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opp. Parties calling upon them to file show cause as to why: (i) A direction shall not be issued to opp.parties especially opp.party no.3 to grant promotion to the petitioners to the post of MPHW (Female) Level -I against the vacancies meant for U.R. category as and when arises taking into consideration the G.A Department Resolution dated 12.10.2022 under Annexure-2. (ii) And after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the opp.parties especially opp.party no.3 to grant promotion to the petitioners to the post of MPHW (Female) Level-I against the vacancies meant for U.R. category as and when vacancies arises. (iii) And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. And for this act of kindness the petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti