Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49666 (AP)

A. Trimurthulu, v. The APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director,

WP/32171/2012 · 2025-02-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY O TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o AA 0.& PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32171 OF 2012 Between: A. Trimurthulu, S/o Sambha Murthy, Aged about 42, years, Occ: Driver C.No.70652, C/o Shop No.7, SRC Shopping Complex, Opp: SBI ATM, Besides Sri Kanya Theatre, Narsipatnam, Vishakapatnam District ...Petitioner AND 1. The APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad 2. The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Vishakapatnam, Vishakapatnam District 3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Vishakapatnam Depot, Vishakapatnam District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the respondents herein and issue writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the impugned Proceedings No. P1/255(2)/08-NRPM, dated 01- rd Respondent in terminating my services as Contract 03-2008 of the 3 „ Qriver as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law and also in violation of Ar^l^e 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently by petting. ' v a^i^e-th6 same direct the 2"'^ Respondent herein to treat the Proceedings: 4-- N^>3 /255(3)/07-RMA/SP, dated 11-03-2010 to that reinstatement with all consequential benefits. LA. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 41011 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents herein to consider the representation dated 12-07-2010 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of Justice and fair play. : SRI. P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. K. SARALA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC.PNV) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010662132012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32171/2012 Between: ...PETITIONER A. Trimurthulu, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Apsrtc Rep By Its Managing Director and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PSRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.K. SARALA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC,PNV) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.32171 OF 201? ORDER: 1. The petitioner is challenging the proceedings dated 01.03.2008 whereby the respondent terminated the services of the petitioner as a contract driver. 2. The learned standing counsel for the respondent submits petitioner was reinstated into Nagaripatnam depot. 3. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this writ petition and accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. that the service and at present is working at Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI. P SRIDHAR RAO Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. K. SARALA REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC,PNV) Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies. AVR vna T 4)> HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.32171 of 2012 CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS 1