SRI GANTA VENKATA ADISESHU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/2006/2025 · 2025-02-24
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4966 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4966 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010039602025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Sri Ganta Venkata Adiseshu The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
“…to issue a
order or direction declaring the action of the particularly the 4th CSDT/917/2024 dated 05 03.09.2024 is illegal consequently set aside the same and pass IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2006/2025 Sri Ganta Venkata Adiseshu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate rder or direction declaring the action of the respondents more respondent in issuing notification vide Rc CSDT/917/2024 dated 05.12.2024 is contrary to the Go.Ms.No 2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article 14 consequently set aside the same and pass such order or orders…..” IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the andamus or any other appropriate writ espondents more respondent in issuing notification vide Rc.No No.10 dated violations of Article 14, 19 & 21
order or orders…..”
2
BSB, J
W.P.No.2006 of 2025
2. Sri K.Srinivas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, requested permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
3. In view of the representation made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J
Date: 24.02.2025 GRL
3
BSB, J
W.P.No.2006 of 2025
150
HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI
Writ Petition No:2006 of 2025
Date:24.02.2025 GRL
4
BSB, J
W.P.No.2006 of 2025