[2025:RJ-JP:47087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15192/2025 Vikash Kumar S/o Krishan Kumar, R/o Ward No. 19 Shani Mandir Ka Pass Singhana, Thana Singhana, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj) (Accused At Presently Confined In Khetri). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Khetri Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 173/2025 registered at Police Station Singhana District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 406, 420 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter as it is alleged that on account of false promise of employment, Rs. 5 Lacs were extorted by the applicant. The matter is triable by Magistrate and applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him. It is submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 29.10.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be [2025:RJ-JP:47087] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15192/2025] served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that present case is white collar crime. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the matter is triable my Magistrate; that there is no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- applicant; that accused-applicant is in custody ever since 29.10.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Vikash Kumar S/o Krishan Kumar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- before the trial Court concerned, along with bank guarantee of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) by the applicant, till the pendency of the trial; for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /183