CWP-12057 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (149) Amit Gupta State of Haryana and Ors. CORAM: Present: SUDHIR SINGH directing the respondent respect of Plot allotted to the petitioner. 2. registration of the Conveyance Deed in respect of the afor e-mail dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P 13.03.2025 (Annexure P assigning any reason and as a matter of fact the said order is a non and a cryptic order. 3. would be satisfied, if 12057-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amit Gupta Versus State of Haryana and Ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSITCE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. **** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (Oral) The petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent-authorities to register the Conveyance Deed in respect of Plot No.473G, Sector-19, Phase allotted to the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he had applied for registration of the Conveyance Deed in respect of the afor mail dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P-1). However, 13.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), the said request has been rejected without assigning any reason and as a matter of fact the said order is a non and a cryptic order. Learned counsel for the petitioner su be satisfied, if De hors the e-mail (Annexure P 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12057-2025 Date of Decision:-01.05.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents MR. JUSITCE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. The petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of Mandamus to register the Conveyance Deed in 19, Phase –II, Industrial Estate, Barhi, case of the petitioner that he had applied for registration of the Conveyance Deed in respect of the aforesaid plot vide his 1). However, vide e-mail dated 2), the said request has been rejected without assigning any reason and as a matter of fact the said order is a non-speaking counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner mail (Annexure P-2), the respondents- 1 2025 01.05.2025 ……Petitioner s The petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of Mandamus to register the Conveyance Deed in , Barhi, case of the petitioner that he had applied for esaid plot vide his mail dated 2), the said request has been rejected without speaking bmits that the petitioner - Manju 2025.05.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12057 authorities are directed to pass a speaking order 05.03.2025 submitted by the petitione thereon, in accordance with law, in a time bound manner. 4. Bansal, DAG, Haryana dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P request of the petitioner (Annexure P thereon, in accordance with law. 5. e-mail dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P consider the request dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner and pass an appropriate order thereon passing a speaking and reasoned weeks from the May 01, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: 12057-2025 authorities are directed to pass a speaking order 05.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, in a time bound manner. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Bansal, DAG, Haryana appears and submits that dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), respondent No.3 will look into the of the petitioner (Annexure P-1) and pass an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law. Without commenting on the merits of the case mail dated 13.03.2025 (Annexure P-2), respondent No.3 is directed to consider the request dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner and pass an appropriate order thereon speaking and reasoned order, preferably within a period of weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. , 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No 2 authorities are directed to pass a speaking order considering request dated r and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, in a time bound manner. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav and submits that irrespective of e-mail spondent No.3 will look into the 1) and pass an appropriate order Without commenting on the merits of the case and De hors the 2), respondent No.3 is directed to consider the request dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P-1), submitted by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, by order, preferably within a period of three copy/production of this order. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 2 request dated r and pass an appropriate order Mr. Gaurav mail spondent No.3 will look into the 1) and pass an appropriate order the 2), respondent No.3 is directed to 1), submitted by the by three Manju 2025.05.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document