DAULAT SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4272/2025 · 2025-11-27
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4272/2025 Daulat Sharma S/o Shri Rameshwar Prasad Sharma, Resident Of Plot No. A-119-B, Shivpuri Colony, Airport Road, Sanganer, Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. (Raj.)
3. Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, M. I. Road, Jaipur. (Raj.)
4. Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Bas Beelwa, Jaipur South, Distt. Jaipur. (Raj.)
5. SHO, Police Station Shivdaspura, Jaipur City (South), Distt. Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parmindra Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/11/2025
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the complainant-petitioner with the prayer for issuing direction to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation of the impugned FIR No. 313/2025 registered with the Police Station, Shivdaspura, Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of BNS. (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4272/2025]
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the complaint/FIR registered by the petitioner, he purchased a plot from the accused respondent after paying the sale consideration but neither the sale deed has been executed nor money has been refunded. Counsel submits that the Investigating Officer instead of taking action against the accused, is treating the petitioner as an accused, stating that the petitioner is involved in a money laundering offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner who is the complainant cannot be treated as an accused without their being any cogent evidence in this regard, hence under these circumstances, appropriate directions be issued to the higher authorities to instruct the Investigating Officer to conduct a fair and impartial investigation. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has furnished the factual report of the investigation conducted so far and the Investigating Officer has also put in appearance in person and submits that as per the investigation conducted so far, no case has been found against the petitioner that the petitioner is involved in any money laundering offence and he is making all possible endeavours to complete the investigation in a fair and impartial manner, therefore some time be granted for the aforesaid purpose. 4. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the present criminal misc.
petition with the following directions:- (i) No coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. (ii) All possible endeavours would be made by the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter in a fair and impartial manner
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-4272/2025] and submit the report of conclusion before the competent court expeditiously as early as possible. (iii) The Deputy Commissioner of Police is directed to monitor the Investigation and to ensure that the same is done by the Investigating Officer in a fair, impartial and speedy manner. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/26