AJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. GURBACHAN SINGH AND OTHERS
RSA/1736/2022 · 2025-04-02
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49655 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49655 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 121
Ajit Singh and another
Gurbachan Singh and others
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellant injunction has been dismissed.
motion has not been issued ten times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on dates i.e. representation on behalf of appellant matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellant there is no representation on behalf of appellant
appellants RSA-1736-2022 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Regular Second Appeal No.1736 of 2022
Date of decision :-02.04.2025 Ajit Singh and another Versus Gurbachan Singh and others
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
None for the appellants. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants/plaintiffs have against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration and permanent injunction has been dismissed. The matter pertains to the year motion has not been issued. The order sheets shows that as many as times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on dates i.e. 28.10.2022, 29.09.2023 and 22.11.2023 representation on behalf of appellants and on rest of the dates the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellant there is no representation on behalf of appellant
A bare reading of the above facts s s have exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.1736 of 2022 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellants …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA ve filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby for declaration and permanent The matter pertains to the year 2020 and still notice of . The order sheets shows that as many as times the matter has been listed for hearing, out of which on three 28.10.2022, 29.09.2023 and 22.11.2023 there was no and on rest of the dates the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellants. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellants. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.05 12.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellants have adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the applicant interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left wi no other option except to
April 02, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
RSA-1736-2022 (O & M) the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the s in the interest of justice.
On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the applicants-appellants nor their interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left wi no other option except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No
2 the present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the of justice. On the other hand, the appellants adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that their counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with the same for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.04.05 12.31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document