IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11745 OF 2025 Between: Bobba Satyavathi, W/o. Devarapalli Subbaiah, aged 57 years, R/o. Door No. 9-1-15, Valmiki- Nagar, Besthavaripeta Village, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Government, Revenue Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Joint Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revenue Division Markapur, Prakasam District. 5. The Tahsildar, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. The Mandal Surveyor, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. at % 7. The Village Revenue Officer, Cumbum Revenue Village. Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. 8. Mali Balamma, W/o. Rama Narayana. aged 57 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. Nagulavaram Village, Ardhaveedu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents more particularly Respondents 5 to 7 in insisting the petitioner to vacate from her agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 0.51 Cents comprising of Ac.0.15 Cents, Ac. 0.12 Cents and Ac. 0.24 Cents respectively covered by Sy. No's 529-7, 529-6, 529-4 of Cumbum Revenue Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to interfere in any manner with possession of Petitioner over said lands. lA NO: 1 OF 202fi one not Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondents Respondents 5 to 7 not to interfere with possession of Petitioner over his more particularly agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 0.51 Cents comprising of Ac.0.15 Cents, Ac. 0.12 Cents and Ac. 0.24 Cents respectively covered by Sy. No’s 529-7, 529-6, 529-4 of Cumbum Revenue Village and Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.8: - The Court made the following: APHC010224442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) wiiTv [3329] TUESDAY .THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11745/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Bobba Satyavathi AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11745/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in insisting the petitioner to vacate from the agricultural land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.0.51 cents comprising of Ac.0.15 cents, Ac.0.12 cents and Ac.1.24 cents in Sy.Nos.529-7, 529-6 and 529-4 respectively situated at Cumbum Revenue Village and Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal and arbitrary; consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject 1. issue a property of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government 2. Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner without following due process of law. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents would follow due process of law and requested to pass appropriate orders. When the petitioner is in settled possession and enjoyment of the property, the petitioner cannot be dispossessed, without following due process 3. 4. 5. of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in “Rame Gowda (dead) 1 ” . Therefore, if the by L.Rs. V. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs. petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner, except by due process of law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of 6. admission with the consent of both the counsel. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. T 2004 (1)SCC 769 Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR i //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Joint Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapur Revenue Division at Markapur, PrakasamDistrict. 5. The Tahsildar, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. 6. The Mandal Surveyor, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. 7. The Village Revenue Officer, Cumbum Revenue Village, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. 8. One CC to SMT. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI, Advocate [OPUO 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 10. Sree (gsg) HIGH COURT DATED;06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11745 of 2025 jvi nn av m: 'X •>:• I DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS