THE REGISTRAR AND CHIEF PERSONAL INFORMATION OFFICER AND ORS v. SMT SADHANA ROY AND ORS
FMA/511/2024 · 2025-03-04
Chaitali Chatterjee Das, T S Sivagnanam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49646 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49646 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
25.03.2025 Supplementary Item No.01 Ct. No.1 PG/KS F.M.A. 511 of 2024 The Registrar and Chief Personnel Information Officer & Ors. Versus Ratan Lal Roy (since deceased) Substituted by Mrs. Sadhana Roy & Ors. Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, Ld. AGP Ms. Parna Roy Chowdhury, Adv.……………for the appellants Mr. Nirmalya Ray, Adv. ………..for the substituted respondents Mr. Victor Chatterjee, Adv……………for the High Court Administration
1. The matter has been listed under the caption ‘To Be Mentioned’.
2. It is submitted that the name of Mr. Nirmalya Ray, learned advocate has been wrongly recorded as representing the appellants, whereas Mr. Ray, learned advocate actually represented the substituted respondents on March 4, 2025, when the appeal stood disposed of.
3. Further, in the said judgment and order dated March 4, 2025, inadvertently, the names of Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, learned Additional Government Pleader assisted by Ms. Parna Roy, learned advocate have been shown to represent the State-Respondent, whereas, actually, Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick, learned Additional Government Pleader assisted by Ms. Parna
2 Roy Chowdhury, learned advocate represented the appellants on the said date.
4. Let the said corrections be deemed to stand incorporated in the judgment and order dated March 4, 2025 for all practical purposes.
5. The other portions of the said judgment and order dated March 4, 2025 shall stand unaltered.
6. Let this order form part of the judgment and order dated March 4, 2025.
(T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)