` CWP-11564-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-11564-2025 Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 Gurmeet Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to grant him promotion to the rank of Inspector from the date his juniors have been promoted. 2. The petitioner has been subjected to punishment of forfeiture of two years’ service benefits and promotion by Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that petitioner has preferred revision before respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Punjab (‘DGP’) against orders of lower authorities. The grievance of the petitioner, at this stage, would be redressed if DGP is directed to decide his revision in a time bound manner. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.14 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. ` CWP-11564-2025 -2- 4. Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of respondent-State, assures the Court that DGP would decide petitioner’s revision, if any, within two months from today. 5. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.14 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.