Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 49641 (BOM)
EKNATH S/O RAMDAS BORKAR AND ANOTHER v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MURTIZAPUR, AKOLA AND ORS.
WP/3022/2024 · 2025-08-21
Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49641 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49641 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 28 wp 3022-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3022/2024 Eknath S/o Ramdas Borkar and another Vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Murtizapur, Akola and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.M. Tirukh, Advocate for petitioners Ms D.I. Charlewar, AGP for respondent/State Shri S.D. Songade, Advocate for respondent Nos. 3 & 4
CORAM :
SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 21.08.2025 After hearing learned Counsel for the petitioners for some time, the Counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh proceeding before Mamlatdar raising all the grounds. Needless to say that this Court has not considered the merits of the matter. It will be open for the authorities to consider the application, if so presented on its own merits and in accordance with law.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) Jayashree