113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CW-195-2025 IN CWP-10530-2022 Date of decision:02.05.2025 RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION GURUGRAM ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Aashish Chopra, Sr., Advocate with Ms. Rupa Pathania, Advocate and Ms. Nitika Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.8. **** SURESHWAR THAKUR, J. (ORAL) CM-6144-CWP-2025 Allowed as prayed for subject to all just exceptions. RA-CW-195-2025 Since the issue relating to 12 meter wide internal road as raised through the instant review petition has been most graphically and self speakingly clarified by this Court, in the judgment asked to be reviewed, therebys no further clarification is required. 2. In case the review petitioner has any subsisting grievance therebys he may avail the but permissible civil court remedies against the violator concerned. 3. Disposed of accordingly. ( SURESHWAR THAKUR ) JUDGE 02.05.2025 ( VIKAS SURI ) Ithlesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.05.02 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment