Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49640 (AP)

GADDAMADUGU NAGESWARA RAO v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/11778/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010204882021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11778/2021 Between: 1. GADDAMADUGU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O SUBBAAIH, AGE 71, HINDU, CULTIVATION, D.NO.3-21, PYDIPADU VILLAGE, JARUGUMALLI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SINGARAYAKONDA CIRCLE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JARUGUMALLI POLICE STATION, PRAKASA DISTRICT. 6. GADDAMADUGU GOVINDAMMA, W/O RATTAIAH AGE 60, HINDU, IDEAL, R/O 6-141, K-BITRAGUNTA VILLAGE, JARUGUMALLI MANDAL MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH NAGENDRA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. M KISHORE BABU The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus to direct the 5th respondent of Jarugumalli Station House Officer, Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, without any authority of law, violate of principles of natural justice and under provisions of board 2 standing orders Articles 14,21 and 300-Aof constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to don't call the petitioner to the police station for settlement of the civil dispute while the OS.no.12/2021 .Suit is pending at Principal Junior Civil Judge at Kandukur and further all proceedings till disposal of the main writ petition.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint of respondent No. 6, the police have made a GD entry and advised both parties to settle the matter before the competent court, as the issue is purely civil in nature. Except that, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11778 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr