[2025:RJ-JP:48349] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 151/2025 Suman D/o. Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o. Vpo Ghandawa, Post Bigodana, Tehsil Surajgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. Director, Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare (Sihfw), Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Through Its Director. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: (i) Quash and set aside the minutes of meeting dated 15.11.2024 passed by the respondents and respondents may kindly be directed certificate to of consider the disability the petitioner and her name may kindly be included in the final merit list in her category (OBC-NCL (F) Physically Handicapped) and petitioner may be given appointment on the post of Nursing Officer pursuant to advertisement (Ann.1) with all consequential benefits; [2025:RJ-JP:48349] (2 of 3) [CW-151/2025] (ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to re-constitute the medical board to examine the physical handicappedness of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 07.04.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19586/2024 titled as Meena Suthar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. and connected matters submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s). 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is liable for disposal in light of Meena Suthar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), which was decided on basis of ratio in case of Radha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CWP no. 8922/2024. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Radha Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and followed in case of Meena Sutha Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) with a reasoned and speaking [2025:RJ-JP:48349] (3 of 3) [CW-151/2025] order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /265