Yettigadda Narasimha Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/29868/2023 · 2025-12-01
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49628 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49628 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010573802023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 29868/2023 Between:
1. YETTIGADDA NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O. LATE Y. HANUMA REDDY, AGED 49 YEARS,
R/O. D.NO. 4-8-100, KARANAMGARI VEEDHI, REDLA BAZAR, NEAR GANDHI STATUE, KORITIPADU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, FOR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFENCES, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing an amount of Rs.2,13,750/- to the petitioner which was deposited by the accused on 16.7.2019 as per the order dated 09.04.2019 passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in CRLRC No. 960 of 2019 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and un constitution and violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release an amount of Rs.2,13,750/- to the petitioner which was deposited as per the order dated 09.04.2019 passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in CRLRC No. 960 of 2019 and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased the respondent authorities to release an
2 amount of Rs.2,13,750/- to the petitioner which was deposited as per the order dated 09.04.2019 passed in lA.No. 1 of 2019 in CRLRC No. 960 of 2019 forthwith and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MARELLA RADHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29868 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025
eha
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.29868 of 2023
Date: 02.12.2025
eha