1 APHC010523972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 26972/2025 Between: 1. SOLLETI KODANDA RAMASWAMY, S/O. SOLIETI MALA KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 37-1-60, TRUNK ROAD, MIRIYALAPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. (LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SMT. SOLIETI VENKATA LAKSHAMMA) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GURAVAREDDYPALEM PACS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in marking the Petitioners properties situated at Door No. 37-1- 60, situated at Trunk Road, Miriyalapalem., Ongole, Prakasam District, pressurising the Petitioner to accept TDR bonds by handing over the property through a gift deed for road widening, and taking steps to demolish the same without following the procedure contemplated under The Right to Fair 2 Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, unconstitutional, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently, direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property, and not to demolish any part of the said property, except by strictly adhering to the due process of law as established under the Act of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents and their agents, servants, or any person claiming through them, from interfering with the Petitioner's possession or taking any coercive steps, including demolition of the property situated at Door No. 37-1-60, situated at Trunk Road, Miriyalapalem, Ongole, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri Shaik Asif, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for the respondents. 2. It is stated by both the learned counsel that the issue raised in the Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025, and thus prays the Court for passing of the same order in the present case. 3 3. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, in terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025, dated 08.09.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. Registry is directed to append a copy of the order in W.P.No.21175 of 2025, dated 08.09.2025 to this order. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:26.09.2025 MVK 4 623 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO:26972 of 2025 Date:26.09.2025 MVK