1 2025:CGHC:55628 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12143 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar S/o. Shri Rameshwar Prasad, Aged About 46 Years R/o. Village And Post Office Hardi Kala, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through The Secretary, North Block Sector-19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Upper Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Director Directorate Of Sainik Welfare, Chhattisgarh, Sainik Kalyan Bhawan, Near Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Motibag Road, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - District Sainik Welfare Officer District Sainik Welfare Office, Collectorate Parisar, Opposite District And Session Court, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Arpan Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiyan, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.18 10:59:00 +0530 2 14.11.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition to direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Clerk/Peon (General Administrative Department) in the available vacant post. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 would submit that the grievance raised by the petitioner has already been redressed, as the Public Service Commission vide memorandum dated 12.11.2025 has forwarded name of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Peon on Ex-Serviceman Category, therefore, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this juncture. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for respondent No. 3, the present writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said order and file afresh petition, if exigency so arises. 4. A copy of memorandum dated 12.11.2025 submitted by learned counsel for respondent No. 3 regarding compliance of the order passed by this Court, is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika