YAADRAM YADAV SON OF LATE SHRI GYAN SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8089/2025 · 2025-10-27
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49622 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49622 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8089/2025 Yaadram Yadav Son Of Late Shri Gyan Singh Yadav, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Village Balaha Kala, Tehsil Narnaul, P.S. Narnaul Sadar, District Mahendragarh, Haryana Presently Plot No. 16, Bharat Vihar, Sinwar Mod, Bindayaka, P.S. Bindayaka, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Accused-Applicant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vedant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 27/10/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 224/2025 registered at Police Station Harmara, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 64(1), 115(2), 126(2), 308(2), 351(2), 351(3), 189(2) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide order dated 27.06.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to a condition that he joins investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicant joined investigation. It is also submitted that the applicant is aged approximately 65 years. It is further submitted that FIR qua the
[2025:RJ-JP:42941] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8089/2025] allegation outrage of modesty are leveled after 16 days and FIR has been lodged on false and fabricated facts. The real purpose of filing FIR is qua some monetary transaction which is specified in Annexure-3 wherein the applicant is alleged to be a facilitator.
Learned counsel undertakes that the applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that applicant is an elderly man and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 27.06.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application.
5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Harmara, District Jaipur (West) in F.I.R. No. 224/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Yaadram Yadav Son Of Late Shri Gyan Singh Yadav, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case
[2025:RJ-JP:42941] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8089/2025] so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Ritu/83