ANIL KUMAR JAIMAN S/O HANSRAJ JAIMAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/15437/2025 · 2025-10-16
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49620 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49620 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42538] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15437/2025 Anil Kumar Jaiman S/o Hansraj Jaiman, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 33, Brahamano Ka Mohalla, Saipur, Andhi, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Sawai Mansingh Hospital, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 3. The Medical Superintendent, Sawai Mansingh Hospital, Jaipur. 4. Netcare Solution, 133, 1St Floor, City Plaza, Bani Park, Jaipur Through Its Proprietor Shri Sunil Sharma. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhlesh Katara For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“i) by an appropriate writ of mandamus, order or direction in nature thereof the impugned termination letter dated 10.09.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside in the Interest of justice. ii) by an appropriate writ of mandamus, order the or direction in nature thereof respondents be directed to allow to continue to the petitioner on the post of Computer Operator (LDC) at Rajasthan Medical Relief Society, Sawai Man Singh Hospital, Jaipur by allowing him regular salary in the interest of justice. [2025:RJ-JP:42538] (2 of 2) [CW-15437/2025] iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioner along with cost of writ petition.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4.
With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/55