1 2025:CGHC:30624 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 537 of 2025 1 - Satpal Singh S/o Narendra Bhadraja, Aged About 41 Years (At Present 51 Years), R/o Punjabi Colony, Besides Shanti Niketan Collage, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Pushpa Bhadraja W/o Satpal Singh Bhadraja, Aged About 38 Years R/o Punjabi Colony, Besides Shanti Niketan Collage, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretory, Through The Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Board Of Revenue Through The President Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Commissioner Bilaspur, Bilaspur Division, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Rajni Guddi W/o Chandrashekhar Buddhi Raja R/o Punjabi Colony, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Chandra S/o Late Kismat Lal Bhadraja R/o Punjabi Colony, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - Narendra Kumar Bhadraja (deleted as per Court order dated 04/07/2025) 9 - Vimla Rani Bhadraza W/o Narendra Bhadraza R/o Punjabi Colony, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicants : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 5/State : Shri Arpit Agrawal, Panel Lawyer. Respondent No.6 : Shri Ravi Kumar Banjare, Advocate. Respondents No. 7 & 9 : None. Respondent No.8 : Reported to be dead. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.07.05 11:39:05 +0530 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 04/07/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2025, an application for deleting the name of respondent No. 8- Narendra Kumar Bhadraja from the cause title of memo of petition. 2. On due consideration, the application is allowed and the counsel for applicant is permitted to delete the name of respondent No.8 from the cause-title of memo of petition, during the course of the day. 3. Heard on admission. 4. This MCC has been filed for restoration of petition, being WP(C) No. 2275 of 2018, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court vide order dated 01/10/2024. 5. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. 6. Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and the petition being WP(C) No. 2275 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde