APHC010145162022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 8479/2022 Between: 1. BOYA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O B.VENKATASWAMY R/O. H.NO. 3 KALUGOTLA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTR 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.U.KURNOOL DIVISION, KURNOOL, 6. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 8479/2022 BOYA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O B.VENKATASWAMY R/O. H.NO. 3 KALUGOTLA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.U.KURNOOL DIVISION, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA BOYA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O B.VENKATASWAMY R/O. H.NO. 3-5/1, KALUGOTLA VILLAGE, VELDURTHI MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.I.U.KURNOOL DIVISION, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND CAD ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 VS,J W.P.No.8479 of 2022 [ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the payment of amounts payable to the petitioner in relation to the execution of works i.e., Neeru Chettu such Neeru Chettu for construction of check dam across Teegala Vanka Near Ramallakota Village Velduthy Mandal Kurnool District vide Agreement No. 2032/2018-2019 on 15.12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay an amount of Rs. 8,65,779/- due to the petitioner in respect of execution of afore mentioned works forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to take steps for paying the amount of Rs. 8,65,779/- due to the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV 3 VS,J W.P.No.8479 of 2022 [ The Court made the following Order: Mr. M.Neelophur, learned counsel representing Smt. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 23.09.2025 MDP