Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49614 (CAL)

SUPRIO PANDEY @ SUPRIYO PANDEY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/5363/2024 · 2025-08-04

Bibhas Ranjan De

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. 02 Ct 32 rup 04.08. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 5363 of 2024 Suprio Pandey @ Supriyo Pandey Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Kalidas Saha, Ms. Khushi Mollick. … for the petitioner. Mrs. Rituparna Ghosh, Mr. Akash Ganguly. … for the State. 1. One behalf of the State one report has been filed by Sub Inspector, Uttam Ghosh, (Investigating Officer) wherefrom it appears that charge levelled against the petitioner has not been substantiated in course of investigation and Investigating Officer has already submitted report in Final Form with a prayer for discharging the petitioner/ Supriyo Pandey from the case. The report be kept with record. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances, the revisional application stands disposed of being infructuous. 3. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 4. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of the requisite formalities (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2