Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49608 (AP)

Ramireddy Malleswara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/26388/2025 · 2025-09-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010513342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26388/2025 Between: 1. RAMIREDDY MALLESWARA REDDY, , S/O.SEETHA REAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. MUNAGODU VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. PUCHHAKAYALA NAGA MANI, , W/O. SRINIVASA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.4-44, VADDAMANU VILLAGE AND POST, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. VEJENDIA SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O PARAMESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-179, MALKAPURAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to pleased issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of 3rd Respondent herein at the behest of the and 5th Respondents in interfering with the personal liberty and the civil dispute in in O.S.No.407 of 2025 on the file of the Cour of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Satenapalli as arbitrary, illegal, 2 unconstitutional, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent herein forthwith not to interfering.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint of respondent Nos.4 and 5, the police called the petitioner to the police station and no crime is registered against him. Except that, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:25.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.26388 of 2025 Dt.25.09.2025 Asr