Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 496 (MEG)

SUSHILA K.THADANI v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/43/2025 · 2025-05-02

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Serial No.13 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 43 of 2025 Date of Decision : 02.05.2025 Smti. Sushila K.Thadani …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by its Chief Secretary. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya. 3. The Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), East Khasi Hills District, Shillong- 793 001, Meghalaya. 4. The Meghalaya Urban Development Authority, Represented by its Secretary, Police Bazar, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya. 5. The Secretary, Meghalaya Urban Development Authority, Police Bazar, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya. 6. Smti. Jyoti Vaswani, R/o Plot 43 (A), G.S.Road, Shillong-793001, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …Respondents 2025:MLHC:351 2 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.Sen, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S.Shyam, GA for R 1-3. Mr. S.Deb, Adv. for R 4 & 5. Mr. P.Yobin, Adv. for R 6. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) 1. Mr. S. Sen, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as there has been further developments in the matter, he prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ application with liberty to file afresh if so advised. 2. Same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed. Judge 2025:MLHC:351 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.05.02 00:41:22 IST