Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49598 (AP)

Atreyapurapu Srinath v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/31376/2022 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010511692022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 31376/2022 Between: ATREYAPURAPU SRINATH, S/O. LATE RAVINDRANATH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O ATREYA TOWERS, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY( HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHONE DISTRICT AT DHONE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHONE DIVISION, DHONE, DHONE DISTRICT. 4. ALUR SRAVANI, D/O SRIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, HINDU, SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O H.NO.4-149-65, TEACHERS COLONY, DHONE TOWN AND MANDAL, DHONE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent herein in interfering with matrimonial dispute H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2022 pending on the file of Senior Civil Judge Court, Dhone, Kurnool District and threatening to implicate the Petitioner and his family members in false Criminal Cases as arbitrary, autocratic, illegal, ultravires and against to the principles of 2 natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 herein not to initiate false criminal cases without thorough inquiry against the Petitioner and his family members in the interests of justice.” 2. Sri I.Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police are interfering with the matrimonial disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, in view of the interim order dated 26.09.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 the Police are not interfering in the matrimonial dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4 which is pending on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Dhone, Kurnool District in HMOP No.34 of 2022. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the matrimonial dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.4 in HMOP No.34 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Dhone, Kurnool District, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31376 of 2022 Dt.19.11.2025 Dinesh