Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49582 (CHH)

AMRIT BAI PATEL v. MR. PANKAJ JAIN SECRETARY

CONT/1738/2025 · 2025-11-20

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56690 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1738 of 2025 Amrit Bai Patel W/o Late Amar Singh Patel Aged About 73 Years R/o Village - Nawapara, Post - Kachhar, P.S. Bhupdeopur, Tahsil - Kharsia, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Mr. Pankaj Jain Secretary Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, New Delhi (India) 2 - Mr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, GAIL (India) Limited, Registered Office-16 Bhikaji Cama Place, R.K. Puram, New Delhi (India) 3 - Mrs. Ritu Hemnani Competent Authority Gail (India) Limited, Camp Office, Second Floor, Ariena - The Boutique Hotel, V.I.P. Chowk, Telibandha, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Mr. A Suresh Babu General Manager (Construction), Gail (India) Limited, 2nd Floor, Hotel Trinity Grand, Kotra Road, Opposite Gajanand Puram Colony, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Harishankar Patel, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Veena Nair, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. K.R. Nair Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 21.11.2025 1. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order passed by this Hon’ble Court has already been complied with as the BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.22 16:24:30 +0530 2 objection filed by the petitioner has been decided vide order dated 29.05.2025 as and 31.10.2025. To substantiate her submission, she has submitted a copy of the orders dated 29.05.2025 and 31.10.2025. 2. Considering the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the respondents, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, therefore, the Contempt proceeding initiated against the respondent is closed. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the said order passed by respondents before appropriate forum. 4. A copy of orders dated 29.05.2025 and 31.10.2025 submitted by learned counsel for the respondents are taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika