ROCKMAN PROJECTS LIMITED THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR C S AGGARWAL v. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
CWP/11838/2025 · 2025-04-30
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49567 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49567 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-11838-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 146
Rockman Projects State of Haryana and Ors. CORAM:
Present:
SUDHIR SINGH
issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the registration dated 07.10.2024 granted by the respondent Authority to the project called “NH Sidhrawali, Gurugram, Haryana”. 2. Bansal, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent notice on behalf of respondent No.2 is accepted by Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate. 3. the Real Estate (Regulations and Development) Act, 2016, the petitioners -2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: Rockman Projects Ltd. and Ors. Versus
State of Haryana and Ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSITCE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
****
Mr. Arshdeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (Oral)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the registration dated 07.10.2024 granted by the respondent-Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority to the project called “NH-8 City of Colours Sidhrawali, Gurugram, Haryana”. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Bansal, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent notice on behalf of respondent No.2 is accepted by Mr. Ankur Mittal,
It is pointed out by Mr. Mittal that in terms of Section 44 of the Real Estate (Regulations and Development) Act, 2016, the petitioners 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11838-2025 Date of Decision:-30.04.2025 ……Petitioners ……Respondent MR. JUSITCE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Arshdeep, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the registration dated Haryana Real Estate Regulatory 8 City of Colours at Village Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-1, whereas notice on behalf of respondent No.2 is accepted by Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Mittal that in terms of Section 44 of the Real Estate (Regulations and Development) Act, 2016, the petitioners
1
Petitioners
……Respondent
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the registration dated Haryana Real Estate Regulatory at Village Mr.
Gaurav 1, whereas notice on behalf of respondent No.2 is accepted by Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Mittal that in terms of Section 44 of the Real Estate (Regulations and Development) Act, 2016, the petitioners Manju 2025.05.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-11838-
have an alternative remedy to file an appeal against the registration granted to the project in question. 4. petitioner. 5. the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 44 of the authority. April 30, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: -2025 2 have an alternative remedy to file an appeal against the registration granted to the project in question. The said fact could not be disputed by learned counsel for the
In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal under Section 44 of the aforesaid Act before the competent
, 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Reportable:-
Yes/No 2 have an alternative remedy to file an appeal against the registration granted disputed by learned counsel for the In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file aforesaid Act before the competent
(SUDHIR SINGH)
JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN)
JUDGE
2 have an alternative remedy to file an appeal against the registration granted disputed by learned counsel for the In view of the above, without going into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file aforesaid Act before the competent
Manju 2025.05.05 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document