Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49564 (AP)

THUNGA NAGESHWAR RAO v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10782/2025 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010556112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10782/2025 Between: 1. THUNGA NAGESHWAR RAO, S/O. T.THRIMURTHULU, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.5-2/72, GUMPPARRU, KADIMIPUNTHA, YELAMAHCHILI MANDAL, ACHANTA VEMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534 260. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, AMARAVATHI THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YELAMANCHILI P.S., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. PITHANI VENKATESWARA RAO, , S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8- 133, OPP. LAKSHMI THEATER, TATIPAKA VILLAGE, RAJOLE MANDAL. DR. BR AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.91 of 2025 of Yelamanchili Police Station, West Godavari District as against the petitioner/A. 1 in the interest of justice and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 2 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with in filing the certified copy of FlR.No.91 of 2025 on the file of Yelamanchili Police Station, West Godavari District and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Crime No.91 of 2025 of Yelamanchili Police Station, West Godavari District including arrest of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. P L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10782/2025 ORDER: The instant criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C)/under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioner/Accused No.1, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against him in Crime No.91 of 2025 on the file of Yelamanchili Police Station, West Godavari District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2) BNSS, 115(2), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard Sri P.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of by giving protection to the petitioner vide guidelines of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the offences registered against the petitioner are punishable with less than seven years period of imprisonment and necessary direction may be given to the concerned Station House Officer. 1 (2014) 8 SCC 273 4 5. Considering the submissions, this Criminal petition is disposed of with the following; a. Investigating Officer is at liberty to complete the investigation, in accordance with law. b. In the event of any coercive action sought to be taken against the petitioner, concerned police authorities are directed to scrupulously follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of BNSS., [Section 41-A Cr.P.C] and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar’s case (supra). 6. It goes without saying that, if any charge sheet is filed in the above crime, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the charge sheet, if they feel aggrieved by the same. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025 JLV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10782/2025 Dated.16.10.2025 JLV 80