[2025:RJ-JP:50525] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19614/2025 Chandrapal Manjhu S/o Devisingh Jat, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Bhurasar, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.) 2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “The impugned action of the respondents by which the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of selection scale /ACP from the due date may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of selection scale / ACP on completion of 9, 18 & 27years of service, counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment and the respondents be [2025:RJ-JP:50525] (2 of 2) [CW-19614/2025] also directed to calculate the arrears accrued thereof and be released with interest.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances, in light of ratio laid down in case of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC & Others (SBCWP No.10581/2023). 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner in light of ratio in case of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC & Others (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /90