Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78542 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14033 of 2025 Applicant :- Navi Jan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhilasha Singh,Ashutosh Yadav,Shyam Lal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Ms. Abhilasha Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Manav Chaurasia, learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 50 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)Ka, 111(2)Kha, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station Rajpura, District Sambhal during pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, as per allegation applicant and others by playing fraud grabbed the amount of life insurance of the husband of the informant but entire allegation leveled against the applicant is totally false. 4. She further submits, applicant is not even named in the FIR but surprisingly when the statement of one of the Jeth of the informant was recorded then he very casually stated that actually applicant also accompanied the other accused, who were named in the FIR. 5. She further submits, actually applicant is the brother-in-law of named accused Danish, therefore, during investigation he has also been made accused in the present matter. 6. She further submits, even except the bald and verbal allegation there is no cogent evidence of fraud and cheating against the applicant. 7. She further submits, however, applicant has also been challaned for offence under Section 111 B.N.S. i.e. organized crime but there is no evidence that applicant is either member of crime syndicate or he acted on behalf of such syndicate. 8. She further submits, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 04.03.2025. 9. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 10. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 11. From the record, it reflects, applicant was not named in the FIR but during investigation when the statement of one of the Jeth of the informant was recorded then he disclosed the name of applicant by stating that applicant also accompanied the other accused, who were named in the FIR and considering the manner in which applicant has been made accused, the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant cannot be ruled out with regard to his false implication specially considering the fact that applicant is brother-in-law of the named co-accused Danish. 12. Further, even there is no cogent evidence except the bald and verbal allegation against the applicant on record. 13. Further, there is no evidence that applicant was either member of any crime syndicate or acted on behalf of such syndicate. 14. Further, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 04.03.2025. 15. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 16. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 17. Let the applicant - Navi Jan be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 18. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 19. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 13.5.2025 AK Pandey Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad