1 NAFR 2025:CGHC:55579 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.A(C) No. 774 of 2022 Tikeshwar Alias Tikkuram Sahu S/o Late Shri Umrao Sahu, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Bodra, P.S. Magarlod, Post Office Bhothadih, Dhamtari, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Appellant versus 1 - Khamhan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Siyaram Sahu, Aged About 50 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Bodra, Ward No. 3, Post Office- Bhothadih, P.S. Magarlod, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Aasbai, W/o Shri Khamhan Lal Sahu, Aged About 46 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Bodra, Ward No. 3, Post Office- Bhothadih, P.S. Magarlod, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 - Vijay Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Sahu, R/o Village Mudibhavar, Parsabuda, P.S. Magarlod, Dhamtari, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2025.11.17 11:01:26 +0530 2 M.A(C) No. 558 of 2022 1 - Khamhan Lal Sahu S/o Siyaram Sahu, Aged About 50 Years Caste Teli R/o Village Bodra, Ward No. 03, P.O. Bhothadih, Thana Magarlod, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Aasbai, W/o Khamhan Lal Sahu, Aged About 46 Years Caste Teli R/o Village Bodra, Ward No. 03, P.O. Bhothadih, Thana Magarlod, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ---Appellants Versus 1 - Tikeshwar @ Tikkuram Sahu, S/o Late Umrao Sahu R/o Village Bodra, Ward No. 03, Thana Magarlod, P.O. Bhothadih, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 2 - Vijay Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Shyam Lal Sahu R/o Village Mundibhawar, Parsabuda, Thana Magarlod, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) --- Respondents For respective parties :Shri Pankaj Kumar, Shri Deepak Kumar Nishad (on behalf of Shri Sanjeev Kumar Sahu) and Shri Pankaj Bhaskar, Advocates. Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 14.11.2025 1. Shri Pankaj Kumar submits that the parties in M.A(C) No.774/2022 have arrived at a compromise and are not interested 3 to pursue the matter further. He, therefore, does not press the said Appeal. 2. In view of the submission made above, M.A(C) No.774/2022 is dismissed as not pressed. 3. As regards M.A(C) No.558/2022, none appears for the Appellants/Claimants . 4. In view of above, as none appears for the Appellants/Claimants nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the said Appeal for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, M.A(C) No.558/2022 is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Priya