Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49535 (RAJ)

DHARASINGH S/O SHRI KANHAIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15208/2025 · 2025-12-18

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51289] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15208/2025 Dharasingh S/o Shri Kanhaiya, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Gurjar Gawda, Police Station Sadar Hindauncity, District Karauli. (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Hindaun City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 18/12/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner, namely Dharasingh S/o Shri Kanhaiya, in connection with FIR No.440/2025 registered at Police Station Hindon Sadar, District Karauli for the offence(s) under Section(s) 121(1) & 132 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offences and he is behind the bars since 08.11.2025. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the complainant being a process [2025:RJ-JP:51289] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15208/2025] server, while serving notice upon the petitioner, the petitioner allegedly tore the notice and attacked him, resulting into caused injuries to the complainant. Thus, the bail application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. deserves to be dismissed. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the statement of the complainant as well as the material available on record. 5. Considering the overall facts & circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court does not deem it appropriate to grant the benefit of regular bail to the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is dismissed. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /123