- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:415-DB RP No.200026/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M.POONACHA REVIEW PETITION NO.200026/2023 BETWEEN: (BY SRI MANVENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE (VC)) AND: 1. MANOHAR S/O RAMA KHELE AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT KAMBALWADI VILLAGE BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 2. LAXMAN S/O KASHIBA KHELE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT KAMBALWADI VILLAGE BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 1. ISMAIL S/O LATE JEELANI JAGIRDAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS 2. JIBRAIL S/O LATE JEELANI JAGIRDAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS BOTH ARE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 …PETITIONERS Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:415-DB RP No.200026/2023 3. NAGANATH S/O MANIK KHALIYAL PATIL AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 4. GURUNATH S/O MASS KAMBLE AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 5. BHIMA S/O KONDIBA KHELE AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 6. DHANRAJ S/O KISHAN KHELE AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 7. JAGANATH S/O SHIVASHARANAPPA PATIL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/AT VILLAGE MANTAL BASAVAKALYAN TALUK BIDAR DISTRICT 585 327 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT IN R.F.A.NO 200014/2022 DATED 22.11.2022 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:415-DB RP No.200026/2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL) Sri Manvendra Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the original suit which was remanded by virtue of the judgment sought to be reviewed itself is dismissed on 02.04.2024. Therefore the petition does not survive for consideration. Even otherwise, we do not find any merit in the review petition, therefore the petition is dismissed. In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2022 does not survive for consideration and stood disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KSR List No.: 19 Sl No.: 3