Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49530 (CHH)

FAGNU MARKAM v. PRAKASH KUMAR JABBA

MAC/1069/2024 · 2025-12-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60782 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Member : Mr. Sunil Otwani, Sr. Advocate MAC No. 1069 of 2024 1 - Fagnu Markam S/o Late Piso Markam Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Karremarka, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District Bijapur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Rambati Markam D/o Fagnu Markam Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Appellant No. 1 Fagnu Markam (Father) R/o Village Karremarka, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District Bijapur, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Rita Markam D/o Fagnu Markam Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Appellant No. 1 Fagnu Markam (Father) R/o Village Karremarka, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District Bijapur, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ramlu Markam D/o Fagnu Markam Aged About 10 Years Minor Through Appellant No. 1 Fagnu Markam (Father) R/o Village Karremarka, Tahsil Bhairamgarh, District Bijapur, District : Bijapur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) 2 versus 1 - Prakash Kumar Jabba S/o Kanhaiya Jabba Inspector Police Station Bijapur, Chhattisgarh (Driver) 2 - Mahendra Kumar Uppal S/o Mutteya R/o Village Farsegarh District Bijapur, Chhattishgarh (Owner) 3 - Branchg Manager Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office Ground Floor, Vanijya Bhawan, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Insurer) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Shri P.K.Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondent No.3/Insurance Company : Shri Raja Sharma, Advocate AWARD (Passed on 13th December 2025) The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably and voluntarily settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to the said compromise and hence it is acceptable. 2. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No.3/New India Assurance Company Ltd. shall pay Rs. 9,00,000/- (Rupees Nine lacs Only) to the claimant/appellant by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal within 60 days from the date of receipt SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.12.18 11:57:40 +0530 3 of the order. In case the amount is not paid within stipulated time then the interest @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of this compromise award shall also be payable till its realization. 3. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Sunil Otwani) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspurpy of the docket (compromise arrived at between SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.12.18 11:57:03 +0530